Comments on: Yesterday’s meeting http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2006/05/04/yesterdays-meeting/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=yesterdays-meeting mind/tech bazar from outer space Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:57:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: fab http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2006/05/04/yesterdays-meeting/#comment-1611 fab Thu, 04 May 2006 07:33:24 +0000 http://www.liftlab.com/think/nova/2006/05/04/yesterdays-meeting/#comment-1611 Victoria's comment on spatial uncertainty (location accuracy + latency + connectivity + ?) opens many questions. How long does it it take to the players to understand the game location accuracy? (+ considering that they are briefed about it in the pre-game session). I would think that their experience with the interface gives them a certain impression of the location accuracy. However, it is most probably harder to grasp the latency and it might have an impact on the mental model index. If the with AT interface carried a sense of uncertainty (giving information on the accuracy and the latency) would they start to annotate (talk) more? Would they rely less on the tool? Victoria’s comment on spatial uncertainty (location accuracy + latency + connectivity + ?) opens many questions. How long does it it take to the players to understand the game location accuracy? (+ considering that they are briefed about it in the pre-game session). I would think that their experience with the interface gives them a certain impression of the location accuracy. However, it is most probably harder to grasp the latency and it might have an impact on the mental model index.

If the with AT interface carried a sense of uncertainty (giving information on the accuracy and the latency) would they start to annotate (talk) more? Would they rely less on the tool?

]]>