Comments on: Quali-Quanti discussions at Ubicomp http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2006/09/20/quali-quanti-discussions-at-ubicomp/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=quali-quanti-discussions-at-ubicomp mind/tech bazar from outer space Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:57:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Nicolas http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2006/09/20/quali-quanti-discussions-at-ubicomp/#comment-1961 Nicolas Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:10:00 +0000 http://www.liftlab.com/think/nova/2006/09/20/quali-quanti-discussions-at-ubicomp/#comment-1961 Anne: I agree with you Anne, that's why I mentioned the fact that "it did not address the theoretical assumptions of all those methods". Bridging Conversation Analysis with content analysis (that use inter-rater reliability) can be problematic. Mauro: no pdf, it was just a discussion and I put all my notes in the blogpost Anne: I agree with you Anne, that’s why I mentioned the fact that “it did not address the theoretical assumptions of all those methods”. Bridging Conversation Analysis with content analysis (that use inter-rater reliability) can be problematic.

Mauro: no pdf, it was just a discussion and I put all my notes in the blogpost

]]> By: Mauro http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2006/09/20/quali-quanti-discussions-at-ubicomp/#comment-1960 Mauro Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:54:44 +0000 http://www.liftlab.com/think/nova/2006/09/20/quali-quanti-discussions-at-ubicomp/#comment-1960 Hi Nico, do you have the pdf or the link for this talk about methodologies to study mobile technologies? Sounds interesting. Your notes? Best from craftland Mauro Hi Nico,

do you have the pdf or the link for this talk about methodologies to study mobile technologies?
Sounds interesting. Your notes?
Best from craftland

Mauro

]]> By: Anne http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2006/09/20/quali-quanti-discussions-at-ubicomp/#comment-1959 Anne Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:40:21 +0000 http://www.liftlab.com/think/nova/2006/09/20/quali-quanti-discussions-at-ubicomp/#comment-1959 Since I wasn't there, obviously, I was only referring to Joe's comments ("where quantitative methods can help address problems in qualitative methods such as scale and memory fallibility")... In any case, as much as I like the idea of using many different kinds of methods, I don't think that qualitative and quantitative methods are always compatible: for example, there are fundamental ontological and epistemological differences if one approach assumes that intentions and unconscious behaviours can be known, and another approach does not. Since I wasn’t there, obviously, I was only referring to Joe’s comments (“where quantitative methods can help address problems in qualitative methods such as scale and memory fallibility”)…

In any case, as much as I like the idea of using many different kinds of methods, I don’t think that qualitative and quantitative methods are always compatible: for example, there are fundamental ontological and epistemological differences if one approach assumes that intentions and unconscious behaviours can be known, and another approach does not.

]]>