Trends in media consumption (Stefana Broadbent at Pic Nic 2007)
Posted: September 30th, 2007 | 7 Comments »Stefana Broadbent gave a very insightful talk at Pic Nic 2007 (called “Trends in Communication and Entertainment”), in a misconception-countered-by-data fashion that I liked. She and her colleagues at Swisscom Innovation built a “observatory” which aims at following behavioral trends regarding communications and digital practices (through looking at 250 households/800 persons each year). They basically collect tons of data (timelines, diaries, how people fill their days, look at ipod content, make lists, check internet usage with people. This is then turned in a classic social-sciences way (although more descriptive than explicative) into pattern descriptions.
Some resulting patterns (sorry if I miss all the data that support these claims, like countries of origins):
- Writing communication preavails (over oral/mediated): people write more than they speak over the phone.
- Written channels are used as background to other activities (like working), mostly to keep contact with loved ones.
- People with digital video recorders do watch commercials, 40% of people with PVR or TiVO do not skip them.
- On-line video does not substitute TV: 33% indicated that they watched more TV, 13% decreased
- Concentrated viewing is short on TV (30 minutes) and even shorter on PC (5-7 minutes)
- Lots of activities in front of TV: talking, eating, reading… internet, playing video games (portable, mobile).
- Local radio are NOT dead, high level of consumptions. Less than 10% reports less time listening to local radio due to time spent on MP3 players.
- Newspapers are not dead, at least in their “free” form: +12% increase in the last 5 years. They’re free and they’re distributed at the consumption points.
Her message was then that there is no substitution, everything is added: more devices, more channels, more media and nothing is thrown out. What happens is that every media is moving in the background, becoming wallpaper: IM+email are ran in the background, Music IS the background, TV is being viewed in background, Daily newspapers are read in the background.
What I really enjoys in Stefana’s presentation is that she does not only feed you with plenty of data indicating new trends; she also goes deeper by connecting them to higher level issues (in that case, cognitive psychology). What does “in the background” mean, in terms of psychological processes: it means that media consumption is less conscious and that less attention is provided. This is done through the creation of routines: automatization of procedure. We then develop “media routines”: Radio channel: listen to during breakfast / News show before going to bed / webpage news skimmed through when arriving at work / call to mother on sunday / SMS to say I’m on my way.
The problem, as she described is that the whole industry is going against this “routine” trend (“Bye Bye routines”) through VOD, HDD recorders, ipTV, personalized radio/TV, VoIP or podcasts. As a matter of fact, users can only multitask if they are not required to give ALL their attention: choosing kills routines and require attention, it moves attention to the foreground and means commitment, and being in control means being focused.



[...] Read full story – Read review on Pasta & Vinegar (by Nicolas Nova) Leave a [...]
[...] (from Stefana Broadbent as summarized by Nicolas Nova.) [...]
Any interface requires some amount of attention in order to fulfil some intention. The user inputs attention and carried-out-intentions are outputted. Seing both input and output as a flow of information, one could define an informational yield. The better this yield the more useful the interface.
Interfaces that can be moved to the background are susceptible to have a good informational yield by relying on cues : keywords, sounds,… can ring a bell and the interface is brought back to the front for the time of meaningful interaction. The quality of the interface is then depends on the saliency and the relevance of the cues.
Toutes ces tendances se résument en un mot : multimodalité. Dans les médias – du moins en France – on peut dater l’explosion de l’offre de la vague des radios libres (début des années 80). Depuis toutes les filières médias ont connu la même tendance à la fragmentation de l’offre. Il n’y a pas en effet de substitution. Il y a sans doute un “effet papier peint”, mais je pense qu’il y a aussi une pratique plus furtive des contenus de ces médias et il y a surtout une transformation des pratiques cognitives qui gère la polychronie (multitasking). Nous entrons dans un mécanisme d’ “attention radar” qui transforme totalement nos rapports aux médias.
Autre observation sur ces analyses : le phénomène n’est pas cantonné aux médias. on retrouve exactement les mêmes fragmentation des modes dans les formats numériques, dans les modes de transports et même dans la distribution (plus de formats de distribution, plus d’enseigne, etc.). c’est là l’essence même des mobilités élargies.
[...] plan et convient donc mal pour tous les usages ayant tendance à se cumuler en arrière-plan (voir la présentation des travaux de Stefana Broadbent par Nicolas [...]
[...] mise en tâche de fond illustrée par Stefana Broadbent : certains indices tels qu’un mot, un son, une couleur, conduisent l’utilisateur à [...]
Celebrity News…
One Comment on“ Funland amusement theme park blog” Steve Marks Says:…