http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2009/04/29/confusion-in-user-research/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=confusion-in-user-research mind/tech bazar from outer space Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:57:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2009/04/29/confusion-in-user-research/#comment-3587 Yves Grassioulet Thu, 14 May 2009 11:04:07 +0000 http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2009/04/29/confusion-in-user-research/#comment-3587 Crucial issue indeed. Usability testing should be about asking people to perform specific tasks using various prototypes in a real setting, and then eventually clarifying their needs or suggestions for improvement. If we only go through the "what do you think?" approach, we collect pure subjective views that might be difficult to digest for designers. Crucial issue indeed. Usability testing should be about asking people to perform specific tasks using various prototypes in a real setting, and then eventually clarifying their needs or suggestions for improvement. If we only go through the “what do you think?” approach, we collect pure subjective views that might be difficult to digest for designers.

]]> http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/pasta-and-vinegar/2009/04/29/confusion-in-user-research/#comment-3586 The Princess and the Pea, User-Centered Design, and asking “Why?” « ZenStorming - Where Science Meets Muse… Sat, 02 May 2009 05:44:35 +0000 http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2009/04/29/confusion-in-user-research/#comment-3586 [...] For another great perspective  on the pitfalls of not asking ”why?” check out this blog entry. [...] [...] For another great perspective  on the pitfalls of not asking ”why?” check out this blog entry. [...]

]]>