<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reformulating the co-evolution of taxi drivers and their in-car navigation systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/seventh-and-half/2009/03/13/reformulating-the-co-evolution-of-taxi-drivers-and-their-in-car-navigation-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/seventh-and-half/2009/03/13/reformulating-the-co-evolution-of-taxi-drivers-and-their-in-car-navigation-systems/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=reformulating-the-co-evolution-of-taxi-drivers-and-their-in-car-navigation-systems</link>
	<description>Fabien Girardin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:45:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Kinsley</title>
		<link>http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/seventh-and-half/2009/03/13/reformulating-the-co-evolution-of-taxi-drivers-and-their-in-car-navigation-systems/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Kinsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/fabien/2009/03/13/reformulating-the-co-evolution-of-taxi-drivers-and-their-in-car-navigation-systems/#comment-385</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if you will relate your conclusions to the work of von Hippel on user-led &#039;innovation&#039;?  I was struck by how your notes reveal your caste study group as an &#039;innovation community&#039; (following vin Hippel&#039;s 2005 terminology - http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm).  Also, if we are to move &#039;beyond technological determinism&#039; then following Latour (&lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TzQAPY8-S7UC&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1993&lt;/a&gt;) we need to take the role of &#039;things&#039; (such as the GPS, the Guia and the car) seriously in formulating our accounts, not as the motivating factors (driving behaviour), but as co-constituting the assemblages under observation, as in your rendering of the &#039;co-evolution of the taxi drivers and their in-car navigation system&#039;. I look forward to reading more as the conclusions develop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if you will relate your conclusions to the work of von Hippel on user-led &#8216;innovation&#8217;?  I was struck by how your notes reveal your caste study group as an &#8216;innovation community&#8217; (following vin Hippel&#8217;s 2005 terminology &#8211; <a href="http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm</a>).  Also, if we are to move &#8216;beyond technological determinism&#8217; then following Latour (<a href="http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TzQAPY8-S7UC" rel="nofollow">1993</a>) we need to take the role of &#8216;things&#8217; (such as the GPS, the Guia and the car) seriously in formulating our accounts, not as the motivating factors (driving behaviour), but as co-constituting the assemblages under observation, as in your rendering of the &#8216;co-evolution of the taxi drivers and their in-car navigation system&#8217;. I look forward to reading more as the conclusions develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

