[wikilike_img src=http://static.flickr.com/50/118397232_515cb783f5.jpg|url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/julianbleecker/118397232/|align=thumb tcenter|caption=a latourian inscription..theory object..embedded design imbricated in a longer practice-based conversation around shared goals about understanding relationships between physically motile social beings|width=500]
I’m liking this Theory Object business more and more.
Why? Because it’s helping me think through design practices — it’s becoming a way to frame what I think many design and change agents do already, or how many design/change agents think already. It helps me realize that what I do is always imbricated in a knitted pattern or flow of practice-based “conversations” around a set of shared goals, hopes and desires about making things for near-future worlds.
Hopefully, it will also become a pedagogical trope that unlocks the general reticence some have of participating in these conversations, firstly, and then recognizing that making things can achieve the shared goals/hopes/desires by making things public.
Making things public is the counterpoint to the problem the poor, poor camel suffers under by being the brunt of the old design/architect joke about a camel being the result of designing a horse by committee. Oooh. There are so many problems with that joke nowadays.
Read More About Theory Objects, Pedagodgy and Practice-Based Design
Technorati Tags: making things public, theory object
Continue reading →