This shift toward short-form, memetic, and affective content offers a powerful opportunity for a policy lab to recode its role in the cultural imagination—not just as a producer of knowledge, but as a performer and mediator of futures.
Here’s how that plays out:
Rather than treat policy as something to be explained or defended, memetic content treats it as something to be felt, seen, and inhabited. This includes:
This format models the world the lab wants others to consider—not through argument, but through affective plausibility.
Think of memetic content not as simplification, but as indexical gestures that point toward more complex thought underneath. Like breadcrumbs into deeper layers:
In this way, memetic content becomes a multiplexed communication architecture—drawing different audiences into the lab’s ecosystem at different depths.
Policy is often about governance of abstract systems—AI, carbon markets, digital identity—but abstraction creates distance. memetic content collapses that distance by rendering policy consequences tangible.
This is especially valuable when:
Instead of lobbying for legitimacy, the lab shows its legitimacy through simulation: “This is what it would feel like to live in a world shaped by our thinking.”
When UBS creates AI videos of its analysts, it’s not just meeting clients where they are—it’s signaling cultural relevance. Similarly, a policy lab using memetic/memetic content signals:
That’s crucial for relevance, fundability, and media amplification.
memetic content isn’t a reduction of your work—it’s a prosthetic imagination device for your audience.
It helps them imagine why your work matters before they even understand what it is.
That’s not simplification. That’s strategy.